Joint Forest Management

Home

surya.jpg (3885 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MOEFs JFM Cell

JFM Cell Officer Notification

Standing Committee Officer Notification

Committee on Nodal Officers

Guidelines for Strenthening JFM

Guidelines for Strenthening JFM 2002

JFM Network Notification

NO. 1-13/97-FF
Government of India
Ministry of Environment & Forests  


Paryavaran Bhavan
CGO Complex
New Delhi - 110 003

August 19, 1998

OFFICE ORDER


1.     Protection of forests having become a major priority concern, the Ministry has decided to extend the scope of working of Forest Fire Division in the Ministry to cover all aspects of protection of forests. Henceforth, this division would be called the "Forest Protection Division"

2.    Further, in view of the growing realization that public participation through Joint Forest Management Programme is crucial for effective protection of forests in the country, it has been decided to create a Joint Forest Management Monitoring Cell within the Ministry, to monitor the impact of JFM Programme being carried out by the State Governments in improvement and protection of forests. The work of this Cell will be looked after by the Forest Protection Division.

This issues with the approval of MEF.
 
 
 

(Sarweshwar Jha)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Copy:

  • PS to MEF PS to MOS PPS to Secretary (E&F)/IGF & SS
  • SS(VV), All Addl. Secry's, Addl. IGF(WL), All Jt. Secry's/All Directors,
  • All DIG's of forests and all divisions including NRCD and CCU in the
  • Ministry of Environment & Forests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

No. 1-13/97-FPD
Government of India
Ministry of Environment & Forests


Paryavaran Bhavan
CGO Complex, Lodi Road
New Delhi- 110 003

Dated 6th November, 1998

NOTIFICATION

1.    The Ministry of Environment & Forests hereby constitutes a "Standing Committee on Joint Forest Management" to advise it on JFM matters and appoint the following persons as its members.

2.    Constitution of the Committee:

1.     Dr. T.N. Khossoo, Eminent Scientist                                     -            Chairman
2.     Shri A.K. Mukherji, IGF (Retd.)                                           -            Co-Chairman
3.     Shri C.S. Chadda, Principal Secretary, Govt. Of M.P.           -            Member
4.     Jt. Secretary NAEB, MoEF                                                  -            Member
5.     Shri G.B. Thapliyal, CCF(Dev. JFM), West Bengal               -            Member
6.     Dr. R.K. Pachauri, Director, TERI, New Delhi                      -            Member
7.     Prof. Kanchan Chopra, Institute of Economic
        Grwoth, Delhi University, Delhi                                             -             Member
8.     Shri S.S. Rizvi, WWF India New Delhi                                 -             Member
9.     Dr. Parvez Ahmed, Dy. IGF. MoEF                                     -             Member
10.   Dr. V.K. Bahuguna, Dy IGF, MoEF                                     -             Member
11.   Shri D.K. Sharma, Sr. AIGF, MoEF                                    -             Joint Member Secretary

The terms and conditions of the references of the Committee are:

(i)    To review the implementation JFM programmes in the country and advise on its operational aspects including institutional mechanism and advise the Government.

(ii)    To review the existing JFM arrangements and suggest appropriate changes in the approach of implementation to achieve the essence of the programme and submit annual recommendations.

(iii)    To suggest approach and mechanism to be adopted for expansion of JFM on other wastelands from time to time.

(iv)    To go through the reports prepared by various international and national agencies on JFM and advice on their adaptability in the system.

4.    Any other matter referred to the committee from time to time for JFM.
 

5.    The Committee will meet in Delhi.

6.    The tenure of this committee shall be for a period of 2 years from the date of its notification.

7.    Sitting fee of Rs.300/- per day will be paid on the meeting day to the non-official members and local transport charges for to & fro journey shall be reimbursed as per rules.

This issues with the approval of the Minister for Environment & Forests, Government of India.

 

Sd/-
(Dr. V.K. Bahuguna)
Deputy Inspector General of Forests

Copy to:
All members of the Committee
Copy also to:
PS to MEF/PS to MOS/PPS to Secretary/IGF & SS/PS to SS(VV)JS & FA

(Dr. V.K. Bahuguna)
Deputy Inspector General of Forests

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


No.22-8/98-FPD
Government of India
Ministry of Environment and Forests
Forest Protection Division

Paryavaran Bhawan,
CGO Complex, Lodi road,
New Delhi - 110 003
 

NOTIFICATIONS

Dated: 12th November, 1999


            As per the decision taken in the meeting of Nodal Officers of Joint Forest Management held in Delhi on 27.10.99, the following committee is constituted to submit its report to the JFM cell on the Terms of Reference outlined below.

1) Shri R.M. Das, CCF, West Bengal - Chairman
2) Shri I.D. Pandey CCF, U.P. - Member
3) Shri Venugopal, CF, Karnataka - Member
4) Shri S.K. Srivastava, CF, Rajasthan - Member
5)Shri R.S. Pathan, JFM Cell, GEER Foundation,Gujarat - Member
6) Shri Munindra, DCF, Andhra Pradesh - Member
7) Shri Anil Oberai, Cf, Madhya Pradesh - Coordinator

2.    Terms of Reference

(a)    To prepare formats for Monitoring of JFM programme at all levels (Division, State and National) with respect to its impact on protection and development of forests.

(b)    To suggest Ways and Means for sharing of experiences between various states.

(c)    To identify items for systematic funding of JFM programme keeping due regard to its long term sustainability.

3.    The Committee can co-opt any other official member.

4.    The Committee will submit its report by 31st December 1999.

       This issues with the approval of IGF & SS.
 
 

(Dr. V.K. Bahuguna)
Dy. Inspector General of Forests Copy to :

i)All concerned
ii) PPS to IGF&SS/PPS to Addl.IGF(MK) 
 
 

 

No.22-8/2000-JFM (FPD)
Government of India
Ministry of Environment and Forests
(Forest Protection Division)


Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex,
Lodi Road, New Delhi.
Dated: 21st February 2000

To

The Secretaries
Forest Departments
(All States/UTs)

Subject: Guidelines for strengthening of Joint Forest Management (JFM) Programme.

Sir,

As per the provisions of National Forest Policy 1988, the Government of India, vide letter No. 6.21/89-PP dated 1st June, 1990, outlined and conveyed to State Governments a framework for creating massive people's movement through involvement of village committees for the protection, regeneration and development of degraded forest lands. This gave impetus to the participation of stakeholders in the management of degraded forests situated in the vicinity of villages. The joint forest management programme in the country is structured on the broad framework provided by the guidelines issued by the Ministry. So far, during the last ten years, 22 States Governments have adopted resolutions for implementing the JFM programme in their respective states. As on 1.1.2000, 10.24 million ha of forests lands are being managed under JFM programme through 36075 committees.

2. The JFM programme in the country was reviewed by Government of India from time to time in consultation with State Governments, NGO's and other stakeholders in view of several emerging issues. In order to further strengthen the programme, the State Governments may take action on the following suggested lines.

(A) Legal backup to the JFM Committees:

  1. At present, the JFM committees are being registered under different names in various States as per the provisions contained in the resolutions. Except in a few States where the committees are registered under the relevant acts in most of the states there is no legal backup for these committees. It is, therefore, necessary that all the State Governments register the JFM or village committees under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 to provide them with legal back up. This may be completed by 31st March 2000. Completion of such formation of existing JFM committees may please be reported to this Ministry.
  2. There are different nomenclatures for the JFM committees in different States. It would be better if these committees are known uniformly as JFM committees (JFMC) in all the states. Memorandum of Understanding, with clearly defined roles and responsibilities for different work or areas should be separately assigned and signed between the State Governments and the committees. All adults of the villages should be eligible to become members of the JFM committees.

(B) Participation of women in the JFM programme:

Considering the immense potential and genuine need for women's participation in JFM programme, following guidelines are suggested for ensuring meaningful participation of women in JFM.

  1. Atleast 50% members of the JFM general body should be women. For the general body meeting, the presence of atleast 50%women members should be a prerequisite for holding the general body meeting.
  2. Atleast 33% of the membership in the JFM Executive Committee/Management Committee should be filled from amongst the women members. The quorum for holding meeting of such Executive/Management Committee should be one-third of women executive members or a minimum of one whichever is more. One of the posts of office bearer i.e. President/Vice-President/Secretary should be filled by a women member of the Committee.

(C) Extension of JFM in good forest areas

For better resource planning and collective management distance from the village and dependency on forests should be the main criteria for allowing JFM programme to operate. Therefore, JFM programme should cover both the degraded as well as good forests (except the protected area network). The micro-plan or treatment plan and memorandum of understanding should be different for degraded forests and good forests (crown density above 40%). In good forest areas, the JFM activities would concentrate on NTFP management and no alternation should be permitted in the basic silvicultural prescription prescribed in the Working Plan but to promote regeneration, development and sustainable harvesting of NTFP which can be given free or on confessional rates as per existing practice in degraded areas under JFM. The benefit sharing mechanism will also be different for the good forest areas. The JFM committees will be eligible for benefit sharing for timber, only if they have satisfactorily protected the good forests for a minimum period of the last 10 years and the sharing percentage should be kept limited to a maximum of 20% of the revenue from the final harvest. The felling of trees and harvesting of timber will be as per the provisions of the working plan. A certain percentage of revenue from final harvest should be ploughed back in the silviculture & management of the forests. The extent of good forest areas to be allowed will depend upon the number of village household and should be restricted to a maximum limit of 100 ha and generally limited to 2 km from the village boundary. For degraded forests also as far as possible JFM should be first concentrated on areas upto 5 km from the village boundary. The implementation of JFM in good forest areas shall be done in a phased manner on pilot basis. The pilot areas may be monitored closely for a few years and based on the feedback and success achieved the programme can be extended further in consultation with the Central Government. Before allowing the good forests on pilot basis, all the degraded forests of the locality should be covered simultaneously.

(D) Preparation of microplan in JFM areas:

  1. In case of new working plans a JFM overlapping working circle should be provided to incorporate broad provisions for micro plans. To achieve this flexible guidelines should be evolved for preparation of local need based micro plans. For this purpose, the working plan officer will work in tandem with the territorial DFO and CF for finalisation of the prescriptions of the JFM overlapping working circle. The micro plans should be prepared by the Forest Officers and Village Forest Protection Committees after detailed PRA exercise and should reflect the consumption and livelihood needs of the local communities as well as provisions for meeting the same sustainably. It should utilise locally available knowledge as well as aim to strengthen local institutions. It should also take into account marketing linkages for better return of NTFPs to the gatherers and should also reflect and needs of local industries/markets. This should be done with due regards to the environmental functions and productive potential of the forests and their carrying capacity as also their conservation and biodiversity values.
  2. In areas where the existing working plans are in force (till their revision in future), for incorporation of micro plans in the working plans, a special order may be issued by the PCCFs for implementation of the microplan. In these areas, microplan should aim at ensuring a multi product and more NTFP oriented approach. Without changing the basic principles of silviculture, deviations may be approved in the existing working plans if necessary. To ensure this, the concerned DFO and CF should dovetail the requirements of micro plans with the working plans.
  3. The micro plan should also take into conservation and provide suitable advice for areas planted/to be planted on community lands and other Government lands outside the notified forest areas including tin the district council areas of North East.
  4. Infrastructure /Eco-development under micro plan should form a separate entity for funding it through concerned development agencies.

(E) Conflict resolution

In order to resolve conflicts in the functioning of JFM committees and to maintain harmony among different group participating in the JFM, State Governments may constitute divisional and state level representative forums or working groups. This forum/group should include representatives from all the stakeholders including NGOs. The model prescribed by the Andhra Pradesh Government for this purpose is a case in point for consideration.

(F) Recognition of Self-initiated groups

The community groups in many places in Orissa, Bihar, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka are performing the essential functions of forest protection and regeneration. These groups need to be identified, recognized and registered as JFM Committees after proper verification of records and enquiry. The period of their existence and duties performed for protection and regeneration should be suitably assessed and proper weightage given to them for deriving benefits under the JFM programme.

(G) Contribution for Regeneration of Resource:

  1. For long term sustainability of resources, it is essential that a mechanism is created for ploughing back a certain percentage of the revenue earned from final harvest. For this purpose, no less than 25% of the share of village community should be deposited in the village development fund for meeting the conservation and development needs of the forests. A matching contribution may be made by the forest department from its share of such sales. There should be transparent mechanism for computation of income for haring the benefits between different stakeholders.
  2. Monitoring and Evaluation:
    Concurrent monitoring of progress and performance of this programme should be undertaken at Division and State level. Evaluation of the programme should be planned at an interval of 3 years and 5 years at Division and State level respectively.

Yours faithfully,
(C.P. Oberai)
Inspector General of Forest & Special Secretary


Copy for information and necessary action to:

  • Principal Chief Conservator of Forests/Chief Conservator of Forests (All States/Uts).
  • Special Secretary, National Afforestation and Eco-development Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests. New Delhi.
  • Secretary, National Wasteland Development Board, Ministry of Rural Development, New Delhi.
  • Chief Conservator of Forests (Central) of all Regional Offices located at Bhubaneshwar, Bangalore Bhopal, Shillong, Lucknow, Chandigarh.
  • DG, ICFRE, Dehra Dun
  • Director, Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal.
  • Director, Indira Gandhi National Forest Academy, Dehra Dun.
  • Director, Forest survey of India, Dehra Dun.
  • Director, Forest Education, Dehra Dun.
  • Director, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun.
  • All Officers of the Ministry of Environment and Forests.

(Dr. V.K. Bahuguna)
Dy. Inspector General of Forests

 
 

No.22-8/2000-JFM (FPD)

Government of India

Ministry of Environment and Forests

(JFM Cell)

Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex,

Lodi Road, New Delhi.

Dated: 24thDecember, 2002

To

1. The Secretaries

Forest Departments

(All States/UTs)

2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests

(All States/UTs)

Subject: Strengthening of Joint Forest Management (JFM) Programme.

Sir,

Attention is invited to the guidelines issued by the Central Government on JFM to the States vide No.22-8/2000-JFM (FPD) dated 21st February, 2000. The Government of India has received considerable feedback from the States on various issues contained in these guidelines. To incorporate these suggestions, following guidelines are issued to further strengthen the JFM programme in the field.

  1. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
  2. To ensure smooth working relationship between the forest department and the JFM Committees and also to bring in a sense of empowerment and accountability, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) should be signed between the forest department and the JFM committees outlining the short term and long term roles and responsibilities, implementation of work programme, pattern of sharing of usufructs and conflict resolution. In the MOU, JFM Committees should form the basic Forest Management Units to provide them a feeling of empowerment and enable them to effectively protect and conserve the forest resources. The MOU for each committee shall have location specific work programme based on site- vegetation profile and mutual understanding. The MOU should reflect the consumption and livelihood needs of the forest dependent communities, plan for restoration of vegetation and clearly spell out the roles, responsibilities and powers. The MOU should define the procedure for necessary transparent accounting of all types of forest produce (seasonal, annual and periodical) accrued from the forests as per the working plans and micro plan prescriptions, financial accountability and distribution of sharing mechanism including ploughing back of revenue for the regeneration in terms of Government of India letter No.22-8/2000-JFM (FPD) dated 21st February, 2000. All JFM Committees should be assigned specific roles for boundary demarcation, fire prevention and control of grazing, encroachments and illicit felling as well as ensure sustainable non-destructive harvesting of NTFPs including medicinal plants and for this, the Committees should be given authority to act, monetary and other incentives as genuine stakeholders. A provision to assist the JFM Committees has been made under the Centrally Sponsored Plan Scheme ‘Integrated Forest Protection Scheme’. Similar provisions should also be made in other State sector schemes. A GIS based map of the JFM area of the States along with village boundaries may be prepared every two years to monitor the performance and to ascertain the status of vegetation. Similarly, the socio-economic changes brought about by JFM should also be monitored by obtaining regular feedback from the committee members. The action programme should also be linked with the State Forestry Plan activities in order to make JFM integral to the overall forestry activities including afforestation on all types of lands. The MOU should also include planning and development of grasslands, other common lands, agro-forestry and water bodies as a reflection of peoples voluntary action for holistic land use planning and management. Agroforestry models developed in various states under different conditions should be studied and adopted. A case in points is the agro-forestry model developed by Nagaland under the Indo-Canadian Environment Project to control shifting cultivation.

  3. Relationship with Panchayats:
  4. The relationship between Panchayats and JFM Committees should be such that the JFM Committees take advantage of the administrative and financial position and organisational capacity of the Panchayats for the management of the forest resources. However, the unique and separate non-political identity of the JFM Committees as ‘guardian of forests’ should be maintained and ensured. The benefits accrued from NTFP sales should be shared with all the members of the gaon sabha including the JFM committees.

    In order to achieve a better coordination with Panchayat raj institutions, a committee may be constituted at the district level under the chairmanship of President, Zila Parishad and under Collector in those districts where the Zila Parishad is non-functional for the time being with the DFO acting as Convener and other district level officers as members.

  5. Capacity building for the management of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs):

The success of JFM in good forest areas would depend upon the sustainable development and harvesting of Non-Timber Forest Products. The sustainability of JFM would also depend upon the remunerative prices for the gatherers of NTFPs. This requires a well organised setup and plan of action for the collection, transportation, storage, processing and marketing of Non-Timber Forest Products. For better return to the gatherer and the Committees, State Governments may initiate non-destructive harvesting (in accordance and within the overall prescriptions of the working plans), equity in sharing, institutional reforms and also strengthen the set up of NTFP management based on the experience in different States. The guiding principles should be to first ensure sustainability of the resources and then maximum benefit to the gatherers and value addition. Panchayats and State Forest Corporations should assist the JFM Committees for developing skills for handling the NTFP collection, storage, marketing etc.

This issues with the approval of the Minister for Environment and Forests.

Yours faithfully,

 

(M.K. Sharma)

Director General of Forests & Special Secretary

Copy for information and necessary action to:

  1. Chief Secretary, All States/UTs.
  2. Addl.Secretary, National Afforestation and Eco-development Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.
  3. Secretary, National Wasteland Development Board, Ministry of Rural Development, New Delhi.
  4. Secretary, Department of Rural Development, New Delhi.
  5. Secretary, Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi.
  6. Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi.
  7. Chief Conservator of Forests (Central) of all Regional Offices located at Bhubaneshwar, Bangalore, Bhopal, Shillong, Lucknow, Chandigarh.
  8. Director General, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehra Dun.
  9. Director, Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal.
  10. Director, Indira Gandhi National Forest Academy, Dehra Dun.
  11. Director, Forest Survey of India, Dehra Dun.
  12. Director, Forest Education, Dehra Dun.
  13. Director, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun.
  14. All officers of the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.

 

 

(Dr. V.K. Bahuguna)

Inspector General of Forests


 
 
 
 

No.22-8/98-FPD
Government of India
Ministry of Environment and Forests
Forest Protection Division

Paryavaran Bhawan,
CGO Complex,
Lodi Road, New Delhi -110003
 

NOTIFICATION

Dated: 11th February 2000


The Ministry of Environment and Forests hereby constitute a "JFM Network" with the following members.

1.    Constitution of the Network

1. Inspector General of Forests & Special Secretary                                             Chairman
2. Addl. IGF (MK)                                                                                      Vice Chairman
3. A representative of NAEB                                                                                 Member
4. Five PCCFs (one from each zone) by rotation for a period
    of one year                                                                                                           Member
5.    A representative of World Bank in India                                                            Member
6.    A representative of Ford Foundation, New Delhi                                               Member
7.    A representative of DFID, New Delhi                                                                Member
8.    A representative of SPWD                                                                                Member
9.    A representative of WWF                                                                                 Member
10.  A representative of OECF, Japan                                                                      Member
11.  A representative of Tata Energy Research Institute                                             Member
12.  Two young field officers (one women) implementing JFM
       in the field by rotation                                                                                        Member
13.  Two representative of grass root level NGOs (one women)
       by rotation                                                                                                        Member
14.  A representative of National NGO Working in Forestry &
       Rural Development                                                                                            Member
15.  One international NGO active in the field of JFM                                               Member
16.  DG, ICFRE, Dehra Dun                                                                                    Member
17.  Director, IIFM , Bhopal                                                                                     Member
18.  Director, IGNFA, Dehra Dun                                                                            Member
19.  Director, FSI, Dehra Dun                                                                                  Member
20.  DIG, Forest Policy Member
21.  DIG, Forest Protection                                                                       Member Secretary
22.  AIG, JFM Cell                                                                           Joint Member Secretary
 

2.    The Network will have following terms of reference.

i)    To act as a regular mechanism of consultation between various agencies engaged in JFM work in the country.
ii)    To obtain constant feed back from various stakeholders on the JFM programme for proper policy formulation and suitable direction to states.

3.    The Network will meet as and when felt necessary but atleast twice a year.

4.    The Chairman can co-opt any organization in the Network. Serial No. 12, 13, 14 and 15 to be nominated for two years on rotation by IGF&SS.

5.    The issues with the approval of the Minister for Environment and Forests, Government of India. 

(Dr. V.K. Bahuguna)
Dy. Inspector General of Forests


To

  • All concerned.
  • Secretary Forests (All States/Uts)
  • Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (All States /Uts)

Copy to:

  • PS to MEF
  • PS to MOS
  • PPS to Secretary (E&F)/IGF&IGF&SS/SS(VV)Addl.IGF(MK)

Information on this page is part of the Forest Information System Project of IIFM.

Principal Investigator: Dr. Chinmaya S. Rathore
Project Team : Dr. S.K.S. Rathore, Seema Jain


homebar.gif (1074 bytes)